Police Response & Evidence Handling in Laramie

---

A Detailed Timeline of How Laramie Authorities Handled My Call for Help and the Evidence That Followed:

When the incident occurred on March 21st, 2024, I was alone, asleep, and naked under a blanket on my couch. What unfolded after Trevor Thatcher entered my apartment without notice was already traumatic — but the way the police and evidence systems responded added a second layer of harm.

This page explains, step-by-step, how the Laramie Police Department and the local evidence/records systems handled my 911 call, my requests for documentation, and the reporting of the incident.

It is presented in a clear, factual sequence so readers can understand how the system functioned — and where it failed.

1. The 911 Call Was Made After 20+ Minutes of Distress

After Trevor remained in my apartment, refusing to leave despite my requests, I was trapped, naked under a blanket, and overwhelmed.

Only then did I decide to call 911 for help.

This was one of the most vulnerable moments of my life.

2. The Officer Contacted the Landlord Before Coming to the Caller

Instead of coming directly to me — the reporting party who dialed 911 — the responding officer first chose to call Trevor, the landlord, who had already left the scene.

This decision gave Trevor the first opportunity to frame the narrative before the officer had even seen me or heard my account in person.

The police report later confirmed the officer found Trevor “calm” on the phone — which sharply contradicts Trevor’s courtroom claim that he was “shaken” and “unsafe.”

(Page 2, Narrative)

** **

3. The Officer Arrived, but Refused to Create a Police Report

When the officer arrived at my apartment, I explained what had just happened and asked repeatedly for a police report to be made.

He refused.

I was told the entire matter was “civil” and “nothing criminal occurred,” and therefore no report would be documented.

I believed him.

4. A Report Was Created Later — But Hidden From Me

Months later, during the civil case’s discovery process, my attorneys received a copy of a police report from the defense.

This was the first time I learned that the officer did write a report — contradicting what he told me at the scene.

The report is extremely short, vague, and heavily framed around Trevor’s account.

It omits the most critical facts about what actually occurred inside my apartment, including:

• that I begged Trevor not to enter
• that I pleaded with him to leave
• that I said “Trevor, get out of my apartment” twice before raising my voice
• that the situation lasted over 20 minutes
• that I was afraid, trapped, and humiliated
• that I called 911 out of distress and fear

Instead, the report characterizes the situation as “civil” and appears to rely primarily on Trevor’s version of events.

(Page 2 Narrative)

** **

5. Trevor’s Court Testimony Attempted to Flip the Narrative

At trial, Trevor testified that when I finally sat up after 20 minutes of hiding under my blanket and said “Get the fuck out,” he felt unsafe and “awestruck” by how “unprofessional” I was.

He further implied:

• they didn’t know if I was truly naked
• maybe I was “making that up”
• maybe I was simply lying under a blanket normally

This deflection attempts to erase the reality of the power imbalance, my vulnerability, and their refusal to leave when asked.

The irony is that the officer’s own statements about Trevor’s calm demeanor directly contradict the emotional state Trevor later claimed under oath.

6. Delays & Obstruction: Obtaining the 911 Call Should Have Been Simple — It Wasn’t

Under Wyoming’s Public Records Act, 911 calls are generally considered public records.

Normally, a caller can request a copy of their own 911 recording.

But in Albany County, that did not happen.

When I called to obtain my own 911 audio — to prepare for small claims — I was told:

• I could not receive it
• I would need an attorney
• I could only get it through legal proceedings

After obtaining attorneys, they submitted repeated formal requests.

Each one was denied or ignored.

It took a judge’s order to finally force the release of the call.

This raised serious red flags for both me and my legal team — because withholding basic emergency-call evidence is not normal procedure.

7. The Combined Pattern: A System That Protected the Landlord, Not the Victim

From the moment the officer called Trevor first, to the refusal to document the incident properly, to the discovery of a hidden report, to the months-long withholding of the 911 audio, the pattern is clear:

• My distress was minimized.
• My vulnerability was erased.
• My requests for documentation were denied.
• Trevor’s account was prioritized.
• Evidence that should have been freely available was delayed or withheld.

This is not how an accountable system operates.

This is how a system protects itself — and those aligned with local power structures.

8. Why This Matters

What happened wasn’t just a personal injustice — it revealed a systemic issue in Laramie’s police response and record-handling practices.

A 911 caller in distress deserves:

• immediate support
• proper documentation
• transparent evidence access
• unbiased investigation

None of those happened here.

Instead, the police actions and evidence handling became part of the harm.

This page is part of a larger effort to document systemic gaps in Wyoming’s tenant protections, police response, and public-records accessibility. All information presented here is factual, supported by available records, trial testimony, and the official police report.